World experience in the development of entrepreneurial activity of cooperative associations

Authors

  • Svitlana Tulchynska National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65026/315a1g59

Keywords:

cooperative entrepreneurship, cooperative associations, international cooperative development, cooperative governance, cooperative innovation, cooperative business model

Abstract

This article examines world experience in developing entrepreneurial activity within cooperative associations, analyzing successful models across diverse geographic and sectoral contexts. Employing a mixed-methods research approach integrating quantitative performance data from the World Cooperative Monitor with qualitative case analysis, the study identifies critical success factors enabling cooperative entrepreneurial development. The research reveals significant regional disparities, with European cooperatives dominating global rankings due to comprehensive institutional support, while African cooperatives remain notably absent despite substantial grassroots activity. Four primary success factor categories emerged: governance excellence, external cooperation and networking, innovation capacity, and institutional environment alignment. The analysis demonstrates that cooperatives exhibit superior resilience and comparable innovation performance relative to conventional firms when operating within supportive institutional frameworks. The study proposes recommendations for enhancing cooperative entrepreneurial capacity, including distinct legal recognition, integrated cooperative education, strengthened inter-cooperative collaboration, and cooperative-specific innovation support mechanisms. These findings contribute to both theoretical understanding and practical guidance for cooperative development practitioners and policymakers.

Author Biography

  • Svitlana Tulchynska, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

    Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine.

References

[1] Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.

[2] Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441.

[3] Beaubien, L., & Rixon, D. (2012). Key performance indicators in co-operatives: Direction and principles. Journal of Co-operative Studies, 45(2), 5-15.

[4] Birchall, J. (2004). Cooperatives and the millennium development goals. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

[5] Birchall, J. (2011). People-centred businesses: Co-operatives, mutuals and the idea of membership. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

[6] Cornforth, C. (2004). The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11-32.

[7] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[8] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

[9] Gupta, D., & Nath, P. K. (2024). Why do cooperatives succeed? A comparative analysis of the Global South and North. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 26(1), 1-25.

[10] Guzmán, C., Santos, F. J., & Barroso, M. Á. O. (2020). Analysing the links between cooperative principles, entrepreneurial orientation and performance. Small Business Economics, 55, 1075-1089.

[11] International Cooperative Alliance & EURICSE. (2021). World Cooperative Monitor: Exploring the cooperative economy. Brussels: ICA.

[12] Kyriakopoulos, K., Meulenberg, M., & Nilsson, J. (2004). The impact of cooperative structure and firm culture on market orientation and performance. Agribusiness, 20(4), 379-396.

[13] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[14] Mondragón Corporation. (2023). Annual Report 2022. Mondragón: MCC.

[15] Schneider, N. (2018). Everything for everyone: The radical tradition that is shaping the next economy. New York: Nation Books.

[16] Shamsuddin, Z., Mahmood, S., Ghazali, P. L., Salleh, F., & Nawi, F. A. M. (2018). Indicators for cooperative performance measurement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 577-585.

[17] Siedlok, F., Callagher, L., & van de Vrande, V. (2025). Collective entrepreneurship and cooperatives principles: Configurations for achieving social and economic goals in cooperatives. International Small Business Journal, 43(2), 215-242.

[18] Skurnik, S. (2002). The role of cooperative entrepreneurship and firms in organising economic activities—Past, present and future. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 51(1), 103-124.

[19] Soboh, R. A. M. E., Lansink, A. O., Giesen, G., & Van Dijk, G. (2009). Performance measurement of the agricultural marketing cooperatives: The gap between theory and practice. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(3), 446-469.

[20] UK Co-operatives. (2019). Key performance indicators (KPI): A framework and guidance for co-operatives. Manchester: Co-operatives UK.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-18

Issue

Section

Articles